 |
 | Who's Online
 |  |  | | MEMBERS ONLINE | |  You are an anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
| |
|  |  |  |  |  |
|
 |
 |  |  |  |
|
Ethernet 101 - CompuClues Arcanum
| Ethernet 101 |
Date: February 28, 2003
From: Bob
Art: Bob |
|
|
|
Ethernet, Round 1 |
| I hope this is more or less organized.
It wasn't written following any particular
plan. Most
home networks employ some form of Ethernet,
or descendant network technology, as a basis for data transmission between computers.
The data is, not uncommonly, formed according to TCP/IP protocols under some kind
of network architecture, typically one of the Windows network architectures. TCP/IP
is the default network communications protocol for Windows, and er, Ethernet
is the most practical media specification that will support TCP/IP. Some home
networks use AppleTalk Network Architecture, still on Ethernet. Others may use
something else. In fact, these statements are true of many business networks as
well, albeit there are very large chunks of business that employ other major network
architectures.
It is becoming increasingly common to see wireless extensions added to a basic home
network, so some wireless networking terminology, though not Ethernet, will be included in
this document. Ease of deployment may help wireless home networks become the
majority of home network installations at some not-so-distant future time.
Wireless technology for home networks is still in its infancy and has a long way to go.
While easy to deploy, it offers less bandwidth, less security, and less
dependability when compared to cable installations. As bandwidth needs increase,
wireless technology may not be able to keep up. The convenience of wireless
technology, however, ensures that it will have a place among networks now and in the future.
|
|
|
| A basic understanding of how Ethernet works, for comparison, will be helpful when
learning about and deploying any network technology. Ethernet
is a Local
Area Network (LAN) technology. At first, this intrinsically meant a short
distance network limited to a few hundred meters. The defined standards for
Ethernet have expanded and so has the distance that can be covered by a single Ethernet
segment. With the inclusion of fiber technologies, the distance covered can reach to
tens of kilometers. This reaches into the territory that was at one time reserved to Wide
Area Network (WAN) technologies. WAN standards specified great distances but less
reliability and slower speeds. WAN technologies have also improved, increasing
reliability and speed, still over great distances. The increased usability of both
(LANs and WANs) is causing what was a clearly distinctive difference, between the two, to
become blurred. At one time, an Ethernet LAN would have been restricted to a single
building and WAN links would have connected buildings on a campus. Campus-wide LANs
are now common. Not that this matters too much to the home networking enthusiast.
Fortunately, the same network technology, used in the single family home, was initially
scaled to fit the demands of office buildings. It will be the unusual house that
can't centrally locate the network "backbone" device, and the unusual home
network that can't be contained in a 100 meter (328 feet--the football field with end
zones) radius of that device. Even if the "backbone" device is not
centrally located between the two football fields in your house, and is hung on one wall,
your computers will probably be located inside a 100 meter swing from that location.
Even if central location wasn't enough to cover the field, the ambitious owner of
such a sprawling mansion could employ a relatively cheap router (and some amount of
additional complication) and push the distance out another 200 meters on copper.
[Eah, I will be happy to consult with anybody who has a house with wire runs longer than
640 feet (we'll be using fiber in your house anyway.)]
Even for wireless, distance should not be a problem in most houses (provided the
construction of the house does not interfere with transmission.) While Ethernet,
business networking technology and home networking technology have seen huge increases in
bandwidth, large increases in distance, and gigundus decreases in cost, almost any of the
Ethernet technologies of the past 25 years would still support today's modest home network
requirements.
Modest Home Network Configurations

To successfully build a local area network design, it is necessary to
understand, at a basic level, what affects network function and how the network performs
at the first three Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) layers. The current market
standard for these layers is:
- Internet Protocol (IP) for the networking layer
- Ethernet for the data link layer
- Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) copper for the physical layer
To understand network addressing and communications at OSI layer 3, you will need a
basic knowledge of:
Ethernet technologies are thought to be the realm of the IEEE 802.3 specification.
Some of the LAN technologies covered by 802.3, however, bear little resemblance to
the original Ethernet specifications. New signaling methods are employed, CSMA/CD is
made unnecessary, the media is changed, new methods of isolating traffic are introduced,
and little remains of the original specification. Packet
format is consistent along with some restrictions that still allows earlier Ethernet
equipment to be used with the new. Little seems to change at the Data Link layer
while newer equipment at the physical layer is accommodated. |
|
|
"Ethernet" is a specification for the physical layer and the data
link layer of the OSI
(Open Systems Interconnection) reference model. The ISO
OSI model (1984) specifies a network protocol stack. A protocol is a rule or agreed-upon method of transmitting data between
two devices. Protocols may determine:
- format or structure of data
- method of error checking
- method of data compression
- required control information
- method of indicating that a message is finished
- method of indicating that a message is received
- other required information
One mnemonic phrase used to remember the names of the layers is "All
People Seem To Need Data
Processing." That's seven words with seven leading letters
to recall Application, Presentation, Session, Transmission, Network, Data Link, and
Physical... ...the seven OSI layers in correct descending order. While this document
will discuss the first two layers, Physical and Data Link layers, it will help to be
familiar with the others.
The OSI model is not a specification but is a generally descriptive model for
a Network
Architecture. By comparing a given network to the model, we are able to
describe and compare diverse Network Architectures that are fleshed out with real
protocols and real
implementations. The model is a framework for discussion. Without the
model, chaos tends to reign.
The OSI model was created to meet some basic
organizational and design requirements. Each layer of the OSI model is designed
so that it performs a well defined function where that function can be clearly exposed by
a set of standardized protocols. Layers are established to accommodate
different levels of data abstraction. Layers should be as small as possible
for the elegance and ease-of-use delivered by simplicity, and should be large enough to
accommodate the functional requirements of the layer. Layer boundaries are
established at points where a minimum flow of data must pass the boundary.
Boundaries are sometimes established by programming interfaces.
Comparison of IEEE Project 802 Model Layers with OSI Model
Layers

Simply put, however, the layers of the OSI model are like links in a chain.
Break any of the links and network communications at some level will fail. Each
layer communicates through Protocol Data Units (PDU).
In general, when you see references to layer 1, layer 2, and layer 3 technology, these
are, respectively, references to Physical,
Data
Link, and Network
layers of the OSI model. This document is concerned primarily with the Physical
layer and the Datalink layer. |
|
|
| Before there was Ethernet, the specification, there was Ethernet, the invention. The inventors of
Ethernet were Bob
Metcalfe and David Boggs. Working out a method to link a Xerox computer to a
printer, Metcalfe developed the physical method of cabling that connected devices on the
Ethernet as well as the standards that governed communication on the cable. He was
inspired by Norman Abramson's work (1970) on Aloha
(a radio network with a shared channel) at the University of Hawaii. The practical
demonstration of working Ethernet happened at Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) in
1973 and by 1976 it was connecting 100 devices (See "Distributed Packet Switching for
Local Computer Networks" -- Metcalfe, Boggs. Note: This is a historical and
seminal document--the specifications listed are not the current standard.
However, the document is a clear explanation of Ethernet design, notable because it is
authored by the inventors. Though Bob Metcalfe says that Ethernet was invented in a memo
on May 22, 1973, he is quick to add that development took a little longer. The patent was assigned to Xerox.) In 1979, Gordon Bell of Digital
Equipment Corporation (DEC) asked Metcalfe of Xerox to work with DEC to produce a viable
networking product using Ethernet technology that would be implemented using Intel chips.
Someone had the idea that Ethernet would become the dominant baseband
local area network technology and that this association of big companies (DEC-Intel-Xerox)
would invoke anti-trust laws. (Compare Broadband.)
So it was decided that the specification for Ethernet would be given away to the IEEE to avoid any
accusations. Sort of. It took an awful long time between the giving away and
the IEEE 802.3
specification, but that's a mercantile story that I know nothing about. Bob Metcalfe
left Xerox in 1979 to found 3COM Corporation and 3COM shipped its first Ethernet product
in 1981.
The original Ethernet specification, published by Digital, Intel, and Xerox (DIX) in
1980 was eventually superceded by IEEE 802.3 in 1985 when it became an open industry
standard and was described as Carrier
Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD). The original
specification was called Ethernet and this was followed by Ethernet II. Then
followed the IEEE specification. However, the IEEE essentially adopted most of the
Ethernet specification for 802.3. Everybody still calls it Ethernet, but the spec is
802.3 and others depending on implementation. IEEE 802.3 is periodically
updated to include new network technology. IEEE P802 is the LAN/MAN
Information Technology working group or Standards
Committee. Look for the letters that follow 802.3_ |
|
|
IEEE 802.3
Committees (Past and Present) |
|
|
| 802.3a-1988: |
10 Mbps MAU
for 10Base2 |
| 802.3b-1985: |
Broadband Medium Attachment Unit and Broadband Medium Specifications, Type 10BROAD36
Clause 11). |
| 802.3c-1985: |
Repeater
Unit for 10 Mb/s Baseband Networks |
| 802.3d-1987: |
Medium Attachment Unit and Baseband Medium Specification for a Vendor Independent
Fiber Optic Inter Repeater Link (FOIRL) |
| 802.3e-1987: |
Physical Signaling, Medium Attachment, and Baseband Medium Specifications -- 1BASE5 |
| 802.3h-1990: |
Layer Management |
| 802.3i-1990: |
Twisted Pair specification -- 10Base-T (1990) |
| 802.3j-1993: |
Fiber Optic Active and Passive Star-Based Segments, Type 10BASE-F |
| 802.3k-1992: |
Layer Management for 10 Mb/s Baseband Repeaters |
| 802.3l-1992: |
10BASE-T Medium Attachment Unit (MAU) Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement
(PICS) Proforma |
| 802.3m-1995: |
Second Maintenance Ballot |
| 802.3n-1995: |
Third Maintenance Ballot |
| 802.3q-1993: |
Guidelines for the Development of Managed Objects (GDMO) (ISO 10165-4) Format for
Layer-Managed Objects |
| 802.3r-1997: |
Type 10BASE5 Medium Attachment Unit PICS Proforma |
| 802.3s-1995: |
Fourth Maintenance Ballot |
| 802.3t-1995: |
Informative Annex for Support of 120 Ohm Cables in 10BASE-T Simplex Link Segment |
| 802.3u-1995: |
Fast Ethernet or 100Base-T |
| 802.3v-1995: |
Informative Annex for Support of 150 Ohm Cables in 10 BASE-T Link Segment |
| 802.3w-1997: |
Standard for Enhanced Media Access Control Algorithm |
| 802.3x-1997: |
Full
Duplex Operation |
| 802.3y-1997: |
100BaseT2 |
| 802.3z-1998: |
Gigabit
Ethernet or 1000Base-X (fiber) |
| 802.3aa-1998: |
Fifth Maintenance Revision |
| 802.3ab-1998: |
Gigabit
Ethernet or 1000Base-T (CAT-5 UTP - July 1999) |
| 802.3ac-1998: |
VLANs (Virtual Bridged Local Area Network) |
| 802.3ad: |
Link Aggregation |
| 802.3ae: |
Ten
Gigabit Ethernet |
| 802.3af: |
DTE power via MDI
-- Explained |
| 802.3ag: |
Conformance Tests --10Base-T |
| 802.3ah: |
Ethernet in the
first mile |
Ethernet
Network Specifications |
|
|
| 10Base2 |
10-Mbps baseband Ethernet specification using 50-ohm thin coaxial cable.
10Base2, which is part of the IEEE 802.3 specification, has a distance limit of 606.8
feet (185 meters) per segment. (Cheapernet, Thinnet)
|
| 10Base5 |
10-Mbps baseband Ethernet specification using standard (thick) 50-ohm
baseband coaxial cable. 10Base5, which is part of the IEEE 802.3 baseband physical
layer specification, has a distance limit of 1640 feet (500 meters) per segment.
|
| 10BaseF |
10-Mbps baseband Ethernet specification that refers to the 10BaseFB,
10BaseFL, and 10BaseFP standards for Ethernet over fiber-optic cabling.
|
| 10BaseFB |
10-Mbps baseband Ethernet specification using fiber-optic cabling.
10BaseFB is part of the IEEE 10BaseF specification. It is not used to connect user
stations, but instead provides a synchronous signaling backbone that allows additional
segments and repeaters to be connected to the network. 10BaseFB segments can be up to 1.24
miles (2000 meters) long.
|
| 10BaseFL |
10-Mbps baseband Ethernet specification using fiber-optic cabling.
10BaseFL is part of the IEEE 10BaseF specification and, although able to interoperate with
FOIRL, is designed to replace the FOIRL specification. 10BaseFL segments can be up to 3280
feet (1000 meters) long if used with FOIRL, and up to 1.24 miles
(2000 meters) if 10BaseFL is used exclusively.
|
| 10BaseFP |
10-Mbps fiber-passive baseband Ethernet specification using fiber-optic
cabling. 10BaseFP is part of the IEEE 10BaseF specification. It organizes a number of
computers into a star topology without the use of repeaters. 10BaseFP segments can be up
to 1640 feet (500 meters) long.
|
| 10BaseT |
10-Mbps baseband Ethernet specification using two pairs of twisted-pair
cabling (Categories 3, 4, or 5): one pair for transmitting data and the other for
receiving data. 10BaseT, which is part of the IEEE 802.3 specification, has a
distance limit of approximately 328 feet (100 meters) per segment.
|
| 10Broad36 |
10-Mbps broadband Ethernet specification using broadband coaxial cable.
10Broad36, which is part of the IEEE 802.3 specification, has a distance limit of
2.24 miles (3600 meters) per segment.
|
| 100BaseFX |
A 100-Mbps baseband Fast Ethernet specification using two strands of
multimode fiber-optic cable per link. To guarantee proper signal timing, a 100BaseFX link
cannot exceed 1312 feet (400 meters) in length.
|
| 100BaseT |
100-Mbps baseband Fast Ethernet specification using UTP wiring. Like the
10BaseT technology on which it is based, 100BaseT sends link pulses over the network
segment when no traffic is present. However, these link pulses contain more information
than those used in 10BaseT.
|
| 100BaseT4 |
100-Mbps baseband Fast Ethernet specification using four pairs of
Categories 3, 4, or 5 UTP wiring. To guarantee the proper signal timing, a 100BaseT4
segment cannot exceed 328 feet (100 meters) in length.
|
| 100BaseTX |
100-Mbps baseband Fast Ethernet specification using two pairs of either
UTP or STP wiring. The first pair of wires receives data; the second transmits data. To
guarantee the proper signal timing, a 100BaseTX segment cannot exceed 328 feet
(100 meters) in length.
|
| 100BaseX |
100-Mbps baseband Fast Ethernet specification that refers to the
100BaseFX and 100BaseTX standards for Fast Ethernet over fiber-optic cabling.
|
| 100VG-AnyLAN: |
100-Mbps Fast Ethernet and Token Ring media technology using four pairs
of Categories 3, 4, or 5 UTP cabling. This high-speed transport technology, developed
by Hewlett-Packard, can operate on existing 10BaseT Ethernet networks.
|
| 1000Base-F |
A 1-Gbps IEEE standard for Ethernet LANs.
|
A
few terms used with Wireless Networking Technology |
|
|
| Access Point: |
a wireless LAN transceiver that acts as a bridge between wireless and
wired networks.
|
| Ad hoc Network: |
A wireless network composed of only stations and no access point.
Also called an Independent Basic Service Set Network (IBSS Network.) |
| ARQ: |
Automatic repeat request -- A method of error correction where the
receiving node detects errors and uses a feedback path to the sender for requesting the
retransmission of incorrect frames. |
| IEEE 802.11: |
a family of specifications developed by the IEEE for wireless LAN
technology. 802.11 specifies an over-the-air interface between a wireless client and an
access point (base station) or between two wireless clients.
|
| IEEE 802.11a: |
an extension to 802.11 that applies to wireless LANs and provides up to
54 Mbps in the 5GHz band.
|
| IEEE 802.11b: |
(also referred to as 802.11 High Rate or Wi-Fi) an extension to 802.11
that applies to wireless LANs and provides 11 Mbps transmission (with a fallback to 5.5, 2
and 1 Mbps) in the 2.4 GHz band.
|
| IEEE 802.11g: |
(Not yet ratified as of March 2002--available only in draft form.)
Devices based on the 802.11g specification operate in the same 2.4GHz band as current
802.11b WLAN products, but have a maximum throughput of 54Mbps rather than 802.11b's
11Mbps. Currently, devices labeled as 802.11g are proprietary implementations, may
or may not pass certification when the standard is ratified, may not operate with
equipment from other vendors, and may or may not be upgradeable.
|
| IEEE 802.1x: |
a standard designed to enhance the security of local area networks.
802.1X provides an authentication framework based on the Extensible Authentication
Protocol (EAP) standard. The user is not allowed to transmit "normal" traffic
until the authentication process has been successfully completed.
|
| LEAP: |
Lightweight Extensible Authentication Protocol (CISCO) implementation of
802.1x (EAP), which includes a dynamic WEP process and key management.
|
| WEP: |
Wired Equivalent Privacy encryption framework is the basic security model
on many 802.11 wireless implementations and it is vulnerable to security breaches.
|
Wireless network
interface: |
Couples the digital signal from the end-user appliance to the wireless
medium, which is air.
|
|
|
In general, Ethernet devices attach to a common transmission
medium. The medium provides a transmission path where electronic signals can
travel. Initially, for "classic" Ethernet, this medium has been coaxial
copper cable. Coax is gradually declining in use, and today twisted pair copper or fiber
optic cabling is more commonly used. Primarily, this is due to the cost of coaxial cable,
and its limited potential when compared to fiber. Regardless, any single shared
medium is called an Ethernet segment, and computer devices that attach to that segment are
stations or nodes. In the case of wireless transmission, the segment is defined as the
maximum distance at which successful propagation between any station and an access point
can occur.
In 1983, 3COM shipped its first NIC
(Network Interface Card) for the IBM-PC (and IBM-AT) using RG-58 thinwire coax cable and
BNC connectors (10BASE-2 -- 180 meters.) DEC was delivering devices that used AUI
cable between a NIC and a spinal tap transceiver on RG-8 thick wire (10BASE-5 -- 500
meters) using 50 ohm terminators and N
connectors. DEC soon entered the "light weight" market
with RG-58 specifications and a number of devices that helped with deployment on existing
networks including a multi-port repeater (DEMPR) that connected 8 coax segments.
...and that's approximately where I entered the game as a small business systems
administrator who pulled his own thickwire coax and made his own cable taps. This
was the same year that Xerox gave away the Ethernet patents to the IEEE which licenses any
company to build Ethernet hardware for a small fee (you could afford the fee.)
In 1985, the IEEE published the basic thick (RG-8) coaxial Ethernet specifications.
The open 10 Mbps Ethernet standard provided a communications path for heterogeneous
networks, and for its time provided a flexible and inexpensive method of network
implementation. |
By the way, "thick
wire" (RG-8) coax was a royal pain, terminating it was a royal pain (well, installing
an "N" connector to take the terminator was), grounding the terminator (at one
end of the run) was a royal pain, tapping it was a royal pain, and
working with AUI cable was harder than wrassling a Washington politician. It wasn't
just-throw-down-some-cable. At the time, I remember saying that they'll never get
twisted pair (10BASE-T) to work... ...and I'm not even famous.The ISO
accepted Ethernet as a standard in 1989 (Standard # 88023) -- strange similarity in the
numbers?
In 1990, 10BASE-T (IEEE 802.3i) worked. ...and now anybody can do 100BASE-TX (IEEE
802.3u) at home for cheap. In 2002, we're all waiting for gigabit Ethernet (1000BASE-T) to
come down in price. ...and others are waiting for the wireless arm of the industry to
standardize on a bug-free, working security standard and a decent rate of transmission.
Because Metcalfe, Boggs, Xerox, and the IEEE essentially gave the knowledge and
specifications of the Ethernet invention away for free, the standard is now ubiquitous all
over the world.
At one time, installing a NIC
for 10BASE-T required some significant amount of PC knowledge including how and where to
reserve upper memory, what IRQ to allocate and what ports to assign. The mantra for
people installing NIC's was "NE2000", and the nemesis was
"RAM-cram." NE2000 was a Novell NetWare specification for an Ethernet NIC
that became so much used that just about anything having to do with PC LAN's had to be
compatible with the operation of a NE2000 NIC. NE2000 compliant clones were common.
NIC's and OS's and installation software have gotten smarter. Now,
it's plug it in, let the OS recognize it and feed it a device driver.
TCP/IP is not dependent on Ethernet for a physical layer, but it is the most commonly
implemented physical method used for TCP/IP transmission on a LAN. It is almost the
only method used for home networking with most other methods being more costly and subject
to the acquisition of equipment that is less than available to John Q. Netizen.
TCP/IP works with Ethernet to provide network services. IP works at the OSI model
Network layer which is the layer just above the Data Link Layer.
Ethernet is both an OSI Model Physical layer and Data Link layer specification.
Just note that the physical layer of the OSI model is not restricted to
Ethernet. TCP/IP can be transmitted over networks with other physical specifications
such as Token Ring, FDDI, various wireless technologies (including 802.11) and others. |
|
|
| The notable parts of the Ethernet specification, for our study
here, are the provision of a MAC address, the framing of IP packets in an Ethernet frame,
the transmission of the packet by encoding it into an electrical signal (waveform), the
extraction of data from the Ethernet frame, the checking of the data, and the hand off of
data to IP. The physical address is the MAC address. The MAC address is generally
burned into a chip on the network interface card (NIC) or other network adapter
device. The MAC address is a 48 bit binary address that is notated as a 6 digit
hexadecimal address--where the digits are separated by dashes. The first three
digits designate a manufacturer code for the device and the second three digits are a
unique address for the device on a given network segment.
Fortunately, MAC addresses need only be unique on a local network segment (subnet.)
Any limitations, that might be imposed by the fact that there are a finite
number of MAC addresses, should be somewhat easy to escape.
The data packet that Ethernet receives from IP is encapsulated with a header and a
trailer at Data Link layer. The packet is then transferred as a signal on the
Ethernet medium, typically copper or fiber.
The physical components of most networks are specified as being part of the OSI model
physical and data link layers. Such specifications include specifications for the
encoding of data, the attributes of the signaling used, the electrical properties of the
equipment, cabling, the methods used to connect cabling, and devices that operate at
physical layer such as repeaters, hubs, and switches.
In general, all of these specifications for equipment, transmission type, and protocols
contribute to a construct that is referred to as Network Architecture. Network
Architecture is the totality of the implementation of these specifications that permits a
network to operate. Some examples of network architectures are SNA, DECNet, XNS,
Banyan Vines, Apple Talk, and TOPS. These network architectures incorporate
network protocols (such as NetBEUI, IPX/SPX, and TCP/IP). Modern network
architectures can often be explained in terms of the OSI reference model. For
each one of these network architectures, you can find a full set of specifications that
will enable communications across a network to be accomplished. Each one of
these architectures implements a protocol stack ( a series or set of rules that work
together) that allows programmers to create programs that use and alter data housed and
manipulated on other computers.
It is at data link layer that data is prepared to be transmitted and received on the
physical layer. Data link layer also provides for some error detection. Though
Ethernet encompasses both physical and data link layers, the tasks performed can be
organized according to a comparison to the OSI model.
For Ethernet, at OSI model physical layer, there are specifications for
- cable
- connectors
- topology (methods for interconnection)
- encoding of data
- signaling
- electrical attributes of equipment
- physical layer equipment
for Ethernet, at OSI model Data Link Layer, there are specifications for
- Media Access Control (physical) Addresses for network devices
- method for framing an IP packets in datagrams (data frames)
- transmission of data bits from the computer system to the NIC
- Media Access Control (NIC to medium)
- Logical Link Control (LLC) error detection
The Ethernet Physical layer of any given network could have several different
specifications depending on media type. Essentially, the physical layer will depend
on three parts of the Ethernet specification:
- The shared media
- A datagram or Ethernet frame
- A set of media access control rules embedded in the NIC
Any computer, or other intelligent device, with a network address, and located on a
network is called a host. A host with a network interface that includes a physical
network address can be called a station. Every station on an Ethernet network
segment shares the bandwidth available on the media. This shared signaling system is
called the medium. Ethernet signals, consisting of a datagram or packet, are
transmitted serially, one bit at a time. When one station is talking, all of the
other stations must listen. To send data, an Ethernet station must listen to the
"wire" segment and if the "wire" segment is quiet then the station may
start its send sequence. |
|
|
| Disclaimer: The half life of the information above could possibly be less than that of
the average isolated sub-atomic particle. Please note that the links in the article
above were checked within the last two weeks. I note that several may have decayed
already. Web sites frequently change the location of their documents or remove documents
that may not be accessed often. If a link above takes you to a site, but the expected
document is not displayed, try searching the site for the document--they may just have
moved it.
Alternately, if you take the term that was linked and submit that string to a search
engine, it is likely that you will find numerous references to any topic in the post
above.
More about Ethernet in Round 2. |
| | [Printer friendly page | Send to a friend] |
|
| |